Desk Screening
Double-Blind Review
Author Revision
Archival Publication
The editorial secretariat verifies thematic scope, formatting compliance, and methodological rigor within seven business days of initial upload.
Two independent domain specialists assess theoretical frameworks, empirical validity, and statistical modeling without access to author institutional identities.
Authors receive consolidated reviewer critiques with specified timelines for minor or major methodological adjustments and structural enhancements.
Accepted manuscripts receive immediate Crossref DOI assignment, metadata syndication, and permanent inclusion in the quarterly open-access volume.
Technical Author Standards
All submissions must adhere strictly to established scholarly criteria prior to formal submission to prevent desk rejection.
Length & Structure
Citation Standard
Anonymized Files
Manuscripts must span 6,000 to 9,000 words inclusive of tables, appendices, and a structured 250-word abstract outlining empirical methods.
References and parenthetical citations must follow APA 7th edition formatting with persistent digital object identifiers appended to every source.
Manuscript files must omit author names, institutional affiliations, and self-identifying acknowledgments to preserve double-blind integrity.
Zero tolerance for unverified data, fabrication, or undeclared institutional conflict.
Every manuscript undergoes automated cross-checking against international citation repositories prior to formal review.
Upload your blinded manuscript through our automated editorial system or consult our secretariat regarding special issue topics and thematic calls.